| DIVINE PRINCIPLEPART I
 CHAPTER 6
PREDESTINATION กกIt is true that theological controversies about "Predestination" have 
    caused great confusion in the religious lives of many Christians. We must 
    understand what brought this about.  In the Bible, there are many passages that could be interpreted to mean 
    that the fortune or misfortune, happiness or misery of any individual, as 
    well as the salvation or damnation of fallen men and the rise and fall of 
    nations, all occur according to God's predestination. For example, the Bible 
    says:  Those whom He predestined He also called; and those whom He called He 
    also justified; and those whom He justified He also glorified. (Rom. 8:30)
     Again it says:  ...'I will have mercy on whom I have mercy, and I will have compassion on 
    whom I have compassion.'. So it depends not upon man's will or exertion, but 
    upon God's mercy. (Rom. 9:15-16)  It again says (Rom. 9:21), "Has the potter no right over the clay, to 
    make out of the same lump one vessel for beauty and another for menial 
    use?". It also says (Rom. 9:11-13) that God loved Jacob and hated Esau while 
    they were still in their mother's womb, and said the elder would serve the 
    younger.  In this way, there are ample Biblical grounds to justify "complete 
    predestination". But we must not forget that there are also many Biblical 
    passages that deny complete predestination. For example, when we see that 
    God warned the first human ancestors not to eat of the fruit (Gen. 2:17) in 
    order to prevent them from falling, it is evident that man's fall was not 
    God's predestination but the result of man's disobedience to God's 
    commandment. Again we read (Gen. 6:6), that God was sorry that He had put 
    man on earth. If man had fallen according to God's predestination, there 
    would be no reason for Him to be sorry for His having created man, whose 
    fall He would have predestined. John 3:16 says that whoever believes in 
    Christ shall not perish.  When we read in Matthew 7:7, "Ask, and it will be given you; seek, and 
    you will find; knock, and it will be opened to you.", we can see well enough 
    that all things are not accomplished merely by the predestination of God, 
    but by human endeavor. If all things are to be accomplished solely by God's 
    predestination, why did God so emphasize human efforts? Again, when we read 
    that we should pray for sick brothers (James 5:14), we can understand that 
    suffering due to sickness is not by the predestination of God. If all things 
    were inevitably decided by God's predestination, there would be no need for 
    man's tearful prayers.  If we accept the traditional belief of predestination, man's prayers, 
    evangelism, charity and other human endeavors would be of no use whatsoever 
    to God's providence of restoration; and any such endeavor would ultimately 
    be useless. This is because the predestination of God, who is absolute, 
    should also be absolute, without leaving room for any change due to human 
    effort.  Since there are sufficient Biblical grounds to justify either acceptance 
    or rejection of the theory of predestination, controversies over the 
    doctrine of predestination are inevitable. How, then, would the Principle 
    solve such problems? Let us investigate the question of predestination.  SECTION I - PREDESTINATION OF THE WILL  Let us first define "will" before discussing predestination of the will. 
    God could not accomplish His purpose of creation due to the human fall. 
    Therefore, the will of God, in working His providence with fallen man, is to 
    accomplish His purpose of creation. In other words, the "will" means the 
    fulfillment of the purpose of the providence of restoration.  Next, we must know that God first determines the will, and then works to 
    accomplish it. Having created man, God set up His will to accomplish the 
    purpose of creation; however, due to the human fall, He was unable to 
    accomplish the will. Naturally, in order to accomplish it, He has to 
    determine His will a second time, and thus He carries out the providence of 
    restoration.  God predestines the will to be one of goodness, not of evil; then He 
    works to accomplish it. Since God is the essence of goodness, His purpose of 
    creation must also be one of goodness. Naturally, the purpose of His 
    providence of restoration must be good, and His will to accomplish this 
    purpose must also be good. God could not have predestined that which 
    obstructs and is against the purpose of creation. Thus, we know that He 
    could not have predetermined such things as the human fall, judgment of 
    fallen men, or the destruction of the universe. If such evil results had 
    been the necessary product of God's predestination, He would not have 
    regretted the evil result of His own predestination, and we could not think 
    of God as the subject of goodness. God, looking at fallen men, was sorry 
    that He had made man on earth (Gen 6:6); and, seeing King Saul's 
    faithlessness, He repented that He had made Saul king (I Sam. 15:11). This 
    is good evidence that these events were not the result of God's 
    predestination. Such evil results occur from man's failure to accomplish his 
    portion of responsibility, and from his being on the side of Satan.  To what extent does God predetermine the will to accomplish His purpose 
    of creation? God is the absolute being--unique, eternal, and unchangeable; 
    so God's purpose of creation must be the same. Accordingly, the will of the 
    providence of restoration, which is to accomplish the purpose of creation, 
    should be unique, unchangeable, and absolute (Is. 46:11). God predetermines 
    the will to be absolute; so, when a person chosen for the will fails to 
    accomplish it, God must go on to fulfill it, even by setting up another 
    person in place of the one who failed.  For example, when God's will to fulfill the purpose of creation centering 
    on Adam failed, He sent Jesus as the second Adam, attempting to fulfill the 
    will centering on him, because His predestination of the will was absolute. 
    When this will was again a failure, due to the disbelief of the people (cf. 
    Part I, Ch. 4, Sec. I, 2--141), Jesus promised the Lord would come and 
    fulfill the will without fail (Matt. 16:27). Again, in Adam's family, God 
    intended to lay the foundation to receive the Messiah through His providence 
    centered on Cain and Abel.  However, this will ended in failure when Cain killed Abel. Then, God 
    intended to accomplish His will through Noah's family. When Noah's family 
    failed to accomplish this will, God had to set up Abraham to fulfill the 
    will. In another instance, God intended to fulfill the will which Abel 
    failed to accomplish by setting up Seth (Gen. 4:25). Also, He attempted to 
    fulfill the will unaccomplished by Moses by choosing Joshua in his stead 
    (Josh. 1:5); and again, He tried to fulfill the will unaccomplished due to 
    the betrayal of Judas Iscariot by electing Matthias (Acts 1:15).  SECTION II - PREDESTINATION FOR THE FULFILLMENT OF THE WILL
     As clarified in the "Principle of Creation", God's purpose of creation is 
    to be fulfilled only by man's accomplishment of his portion of 
    responsibility. The will for the providence of restoration, which is to 
    fulfill this purpose, being absolute, is not for man to interfere with; 
    however, man must accomplish his own portion of responsibility in order for 
    the will to be accomplished. Therefore, God's purpose of creation was to be 
    fulfilled only through man's accomplishing his portion of responsibility by 
    not eating of the fruit of the Tree of the Knowledge of Good and Evil (Gen. 
    2:17).  Accordingly, even in accomplishing the purpose of the providence of 
    restoration, the will can be fulfilled only through the accomplishment of 
    man's responsibility by the central figure in charge of the mission. In 
    Jesus' day, the people should have believed in Jesus absolutely, in order 
    that he might accomplish the purpose of the providence of salvation. But due 
    to their disbelief, they could not accomplish their portion of 
    responsibility, and naturally, the accomplishment of the will had to be 
    postponed to the day of the Second Advent.  Then, to what degree and to what extent would God predetermine the 
    accomplishment of the will? As mentioned, God's will to accomplish the 
    purpose of the providence of restoration is absolute, but the accomplishment 
    of the will is relative. So, it is predetermined that the will is to be 
    accomplished, but only through God's 95 percent responsibility and man's 5 
    percent responsibility combined. Indicating the proportion of man's 
    responsibility as 5 percent is only to say that man's responsibility is 
    extremely small compared to God's. Nevertheless, we must understand that, 
    for man, it means 100 percent effort.  To cite examples: the accomplishment of the will centering on Adam and 
    Eve was predestined to be fulfilled by the fulfillment of their own portion 
    of responsibility, namely, by not eating of the fruit of the Tree of the 
    Knowledge of Good and Evil. The providence of restoration centering on Noah 
    was predestined to be fulfilled by the accomplishment of his own portion of 
    responsibility, through his loyalty in building the ark. The providence of 
    salvation through Jesus was predestined to be accomplished through the 
    fulfillment of responsibility on the part of fallen men by their believing 
    in Jesus as the Messiah and following him (John 3:16). Men have caused the 
    prolongation of God's providence of restoration by not fulfilling even their 
    small amount of responsibility.  The Bible says, "The prayer of faith will save the sick man." (James 
    5:15); "Your faith has made you well." (Mark 5:34); "For every one who asks 
    receives, and he who seeks finds, and to him who knocks it will be opened." 
    (Matt. 7:8). All these Biblical passages prove that the will is predestined 
    to be fulfilled by the accomplishment of man's own portion of 
    responsibility. We can understand well enough how small were the 
    responsibilities men took charge of in all these instances, compared to 
    God's responsible portion of toil and grace.  At the same time, from the fact that through their failure to accomplish 
    their portions of responsibility, the central figures in the providence were 
    compelled to cause the prolongation of the providence of restoration, we can 
    well imagine how extremely difficult it was for them to fulfill even a 
    relatively small responsibility.  SECTION III - PREDESTINATION OF MAN  Adam and Eve could have become good human ancestors if they had 
    accomplished their own portion of responsibility by obeying God's injunction 
    not to eat the fruit of the Tree of the Knowledge of Good and Evil, but they 
    failed to do so. Therefore, God could not predestine them, absolutely, to be 
    good human ancestors. In the case of fallen men, a chosen man could become a 
    person of God's predestination only by accomplishing his own portion of 
    responsibility. Therefore, God cannot predestine a certain person with 
    absolute certainty that he will become what he is predestined to be.  Then, to what degree does God predestine man? In God's accomplishment of 
    His will, centering on a certain person, He establishes it as an 
    indispensable condition that the man must fulfill his own portion of 
    responsibility. Therefore, God, in predestining a person for a certain 
    mission, determines that the person will be what he is predestined to be 
    only by the 100 percent accomplishment of the will centering on the person, 
    with God's portion of 95 percent responsibility and man's portion of 5 
    percent responsibility accomplished together. Therefore, if the person fails 
    to accomplish his own portion of responsibility, he cannot become the person 
    God predestined.  For example, when God chose Moses, He predestined him to be the great 
    leader capable of bringing the elected people to the blessed land of Canaan, 
    but only by accomplishing his own portion of responsibility (Ex. 3:10). When 
    in Kadesh-barnea Moses went against God's will by striking the rock twice, 
    he failed to carry out his responsibility, thus nullifying God's 
    predestination; he died on the way to the appointed place (Num. 20:7-12, 
    20:24, 27:14). Likewise, when God chose Judas Iscariot, He predestined him 
    to be Jesus' apostle if he accomplished his own portion of responsibility 
    with loyalty. However, since Judas failed to carry out his responsibility, 
    God's predestination was not fulfilled and Judas turned out to be a 
    betrayer.  When God called the Jewish people, He predestined them to be the chosen 
    nation of glory, but only by fulfilling their portion of responsibility 
    through their faith and service. Nevertheless, the predestination was not 
    realized because they delivered Jesus to be crucified; and therefore, the 
    chosen nation was scattered.  Next, let us examine the conditions and qualifications for becoming the 
    central figure of the providence of restoration in God's predestination. The 
    purpose of God's providence of salvation is to restore the fallen world to 
    the original world of creation. Though the times of their salvation may 
    differ, all fallen men are predestined to be saved (II Peter 3:9). Just as 
    with the process of His creation, God's providence of salvation, which is 
    the providence of re-creation, cannot be accomplished in a moment. 
    Therefore, this providence is gradually broadening its scope to cover the 
    whole, starting from "one". Thus, in the predestination of the providence of 
    salvation, God first predestines the central figure and calls him to the 
    mission.  What conditions and qualifications must this central figure have? First, 
    he must be born out of the chosen nation, in charge of the providence of 
    restoration. Next, even within the chosen nation, he must be the descendant 
    of ancestors with many accomplishments of goodness. Then, even though he may 
    be the descendant of ancestors with many good deeds, he must be endowed with 
    the natural disposition suitable for the accomplishment of the will. Even if 
    a man has these endowments, he must subsequently have good conditions in 
    which to grow and work in his lifetime. Still, even among these persons, God 
    would select first the individual most fully prepared at the appropriate 
    time and place of God's need.  SECTION IV - ELUCIDATION OF BIBLICAL VERSES WHICH JUSTIFY THE 
    THEORY OF PREDESTINATION  We have clarified many problems concerning God's predestination. But the 
    problem yet to be solved is how to elucidate the Biblical records, such as 
    those enumerated in the introduction to this chapter, which are written as 
    though all things are of God's absolute predestination.  Let us first elucidate Romans 8:29-30, which says:  For those whom He foreknew He also predestined...and those whom He 
    predestined He also called; and those whom He called He also justified; and 
    those whom He justified He also glorified.  God, being omniscient, knows who is endowed with the qualities to be the 
    central figure in the providence of restoration (cf. Sec. III--199). 
    Therefore, God predestines and calls the person He foreknew in order to 
    fulfill the purpose of the providence of restoration. Calling the person is 
    God's portion of responsibility, but this alone has nothing to do with the 
    person's being justified and finally glorified in God. He must accomplish 
    his own responsibility in the position of a person called by God before he 
    can be justified; only after he is thus justified will he be glorified by 
    God. It is predestined that man can enjoy glory from God only by 
    accomplishing his own portion of responsibility. There are no words such as 
    "man's own portion of responsibility" in the Bible, so everything appears to 
    be accomplished merely by God's absolute predestination.  The Bible says (Rom. 9:15-16):  ...'I will have mercy on whom I have mercy, and I will have compassion on 
    whom I have compassion.'. So it depends not upon man's will or exertion, but 
    upon God's mercy.  As elucidated above, God chooses the one who is most suitable for the 
    fulfillment of the purpose of restoration, foreknowing all his qualities. 
    Therefore, it is God's privilege to elect such a person and to have mercy on 
    him or have compassion for him. It depends not upon man's desire or 
    endeavor. These Biblical verses are given in order to emphasize the power 
    and grace of God.  It is again said (Rom. 9:21):  Has the potter no right over the clay, to make out of the same lump one 
    vessel for beauty and another for menial use?  It has already been said that God set up man's own portion of 
    responsibility as the condition to exalt him to be the lord of all creation 
    and to love him most by having man take after His creative nature. However, 
    man fell, having violated this condition. Therefore, man became an existence 
    deserted like trash; so this verse was given to teach people that man has no 
    right to complain against whatever way God may handle men of this kind.  Further, the Bible states that God loved Jacob but hated Esau, and that 
    "The elder will serve the younger." (Rom. 9:10-13). What must have been the 
    reason that God loved Jacob and hated Esau while they were not yet born and 
    had done nothing, either good or bad? This was to fulfill God's program in 
    the course of the providence of restoration. Further details will be 
    discussed in the section covering the providence of restoration centering on 
    Abraham's family (cf. Part II, Ch. 1, Sec. III--261). We must understand 
    here that God gave Isaac twin sons, Esau and Jacob, because He had to 
    restore through indemnity the will for the restoration of the birthright, 
    which had been left unaccomplished by Cain's killing of Abel in Adam's 
    family. This He intended to do by setting up the twin brothers, in the 
    positions of Cain and Abel, and by having Jacob (in the position of Abel) 
    make Esau (in the position of Cain) give in. God said this because Esau, 
    being in the position of Cain, was liable to be hated by God, while Jacob, 
    being in the position of Abel, was entitled to His love.  God's actually either loving or hating one or the other depended upon the 
    fulfillment of their respective portions of responsibility. In fact, Esau, 
    having surrendered in obedience to Jacob, received a blessing of love equal 
    to Jacob's though he was in the position liable to be hated by God. On the 
    other hand, Jacob, though he was in the position to be loved by God, could 
    not have received such love if he had failed to accomplish his portion of 
    responsibility.  It was because of ignorance about the relationship of man's portion of 
    responsibility to God's in fulfilling the purpose of the providence of 
    restoration that there appeared a man like Calvin, who obstinately held to 
    his "theory of predestination", and that such a theory has been believed by 
    so many people for so long.  |